Work that department pages can hide
Shared initiatives
See where City departments, OSR, utilities, funders, and community organizations contribute to the same outcome—and where the public record cannot safely divide the credit.
This is an attribution crosswalk, not an assessment. It does not score departments, change goal statuses, divide grant dollars, or treat participation as proof of equal responsibility.
A lot of this plan's real work happens through partnerships — with Duke Energy, Guilford County, nonprofits, and others — that a single department's page wouldn't show on its own. This page lists who's working with whom, and is honest about the cases where a project's credit genuinely can't be divided among partners from the public record.
Collaboration summary
How to read attribution
- Documented: a source explicitly names the participants and relationship.
- Mixed: some links are explicit and others require cross-referencing.
- Inferred: records show a shared dependency, but not a formal collaboration.
- Unresolved: sources conflict or omit participant identities.
Use this with OSR, Shree, and department teams
Reviewers can confirm a participant's role, supply a primary source, identify a missing collaborator, or explain an organizational boundary. Proposed changes continue through the existing evidence review process; they are not published as fact until supported.